Does Manorbier Sam need some help...?

I read your latest drivel and had to shake my head in pity for you.

I presume that whoever Llamedos is, they may offer you some guidance in the mis-conceptions that you have regarding the FOI, if not, perhaps Mr. C. might have some intelligent input (Is he also Llamedos?). One may recall that you recently compared yourself to a "political journalist" - may I respectfully suggest you stick to your day job. At least you have managed to purchase a PC out of your present income.....

Your blog states -

"This affair will no doubt cause more than a little embarrassment to individual councillors, the ex-Clerk and indeed, the Council as a whole, but that is no reason to suppress the information".

For what reason do you believe there to be any embarrassment by any of the parties mentioned? Oh, hang on a minute - the "individual councillors" part would not be referring to why a certain councillor was required by the Bank to provide further personal information, which they refused to do, would it? And then that member refusing to become a signatory? Fancy dropping your "mate" in it like that.... What else do have to report on that little saga?

The whole episode should be recorded in the Minutes - but you know that, don't you....?

As it has been said in the past, you are being drip-fed nonsense and you fall for it hook, line and sinker. Makes you look the real Manorbier puppet. As suggested before, perhaps you should broaden your network - discover the real truth, instead of your usual drivel.